Diastema closure with direct composite resin veneer: case report

Authors

  • Karoline Corrêa Vasconcelos Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author
  • Fernando dos Santos Gonçalves Júnior Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author
  • Guilherme Motta Antunes Ferreira Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author
  • Kathleen Rebelo de Sousa Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author
  • Márcio Langbeck Castelo Branco Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author
  • Luã Lopes Borges Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author
  • Alberto Tadeu do Nascimento Borges Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author
  • Zobélia Maria de Souza Lopes Faculdade do Amazonas (IAES), Brasil. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70614/e44nnj92

Keywords:

Direct Facets, Aesthetics, Diastema Closure, Composite Resin

Abstract

The search for an aesthetic standard is increasingly frequent and restoring a harmonious smile represents a real challenge for restorative dentistry. Composite resins are aesthetic and adhesive materials that have received special attention for ensuring predictable and lasting results with minimal tooth sacrifice. The technique of making direct veneers is simple, but requires discretion and attention from its indication to the final stages of its execution. The procedure has high success rates and predictable results with desirable longevity for anterior teeth. The objective of this study was to present a clinical case of diastema closure with direct composite resin veneers on anterior teeth and maxillary first premolars, with the aid of diagnostic wax-up for better accuracy of work on anterior teeth. It is concluded that the application of the direct restorative technique allowed a fast, low, cost and less invasive treatment. Providing a satisfactory result, raising self-esteem and allowing a restoration of the patient's facial aesthetics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Al-Asmar AA, Al-Hiyasat AS, Abu-Awwad M, Mousa HN, Salim NA, Almadani W, et al. Reframing perceptions in restorative dentistry: evidence-based dentistry and clinical decision-making. Int J Dent. 2021;2021.

2. Aydın N, Topçu FT, Karaoğlanoğlu S, Oktay EA, Erdemir U. Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins. J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 May 1;13(5):e446.

3. Goyal A, Nikhil V, Singh R. Diastema closure in anterior teeth using a posterior matrix. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016(2538526).

4. Mathias P, Da Silva EVF, Aguiar TR, Andrade AS, Azevedo J. A Conservative Esthetic Approach Using Enamel Recontouring and Composite Resin Restorations. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016.

5. Xia J, Li Y, Cai D, Shi X, Zhao S, Yang X. Direct resin composite restoration of maxillary central incisors using a 3D-printed template: two clinical cases. BMC Oral Health. 2018 Sep 20;18(1).

6. Gomes G, Oliveira Corbellini A, Rotta W, Martos J, Boeira G. Interdisciplinary esthetic approach in clinical dental rehabilitation. J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep 1;24(5):519.

7. Alkhadim YK, Hulbah MJ, Nassar HM. Color shift, color stability, and post-polishing surface roughness of esthetic resin composites. Materials (Basel). 2020 Mar 1;13(6).

8. Abdulrahman MS. Evaluation of the sealing ability of direct versus direct-indirect veneer techniques: an in vitro study. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021.

9. Korkut B, Yanikoglu F, Tagtekin D. Direct midline diastema closure with composite layering technique: a one-year follow-up. Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016.

10. Prabhu R, Bhaskaran S, Prabhu KRG, Eswaran MA, Phanikrishna G, Deepthi B. Clinical evaluation of direct composite restoration done for midline diastema closure – long-term study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Aug 1;7(Suppl 2):S559.

11. Lombardo G, Vena F, Negri P, Pagano S, Barilotti C, Paglia L, et al. Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in the different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2020;21(2):115–22.

12. Maluly-Proni AT, Oliveira-Reis B, Assunção WG, Dos Santos PH. Minimum intervention management of diastema closure using cordless displacement system and laminate veneers: A 2-year follow-up. Eur J Dent. 2018 Jul 1;12(3):446.

13. Demarco FF, Baldissera RA, Madruga FC, Simões RC, Lund RG, Correa MB, et al. Anterior composite restorations in clinical practice: findings from asurvey with general dental practitioners. J Appl Oral Sci. 2013;21(6):497.

14. Bailey O, McGuirk C, O´Connor C. Matrix transfer techniques for direct paste composite resins. Br Dent J. 2022 Jul 22;233(2):91.

15. Poubel DL do N, Ghanem Zanon AE, Franco Almeida JC, Vicente Melo De Lucas Rezende L, Pimentel Garcia FC. Composite resin preheating techniques for cementation of indirect restorations. Int J Biomater. 2022;2022.

16. Novelli C, Scribante A. Minimally invasive diastema restoration with prefabricated sectional veneers. Dent J. 2020 Jun 24;8(2).

17. Shah Y, Shiraguppi V, Deosarkar B, Shelke U. Long-term survival and reasons for failure in direct anterior composite restorations: A systematic review. J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep 1;24(5):415.

18. Gomes GH, Corbellini A de O, Rotta WG, Martos JJ, Boeira GF, Oliveira Corbellini A, et al. Interdisciplinary esthetic approach in clinical dental rehabilitation. J Conserv Dent. 2021 Sep 1;24(5):519.

19. Farronato D, Mangano F, Pieroni S, Giudice G Lo, Briguglio R, Briguglio F. Esthetic integration between ceramic veneers and composite restorations: a case report. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2012 Jul;3(3–4):132.

20. Hwang S-K, Ha J-H, Jin M-U, Kim S-K, Kim Y-K. Diastema closure using direct bonding restorations combined with orthodontic treatment: a case report. Restor Dent Endod. 2012;37(3):165.

21. Gresnigt MMM, Sugii MM, Johanns KBFW, van der Made SAM. Comparison of conventional ceramic laminate veneers, partial laminate veneers and direct composite resin restorations in fracture strength after aging. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021 Feb 1;114.

22. Guarnieri FDF, Briso ALF, Ramos FDSES, Esteves LMB, Omoto ÉM, Sundfeld RH, et al. Use of auxiliary devices during retreatment of direct resin composite veneers. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6).

23. Abduo J. Morphological symmetry of maxillary anterior teeth before and after prosthodontic planning: comparison between conventional and digital diagnostic wax-ups. Med Princ Pract. 2016 Apr 1;25(3):276.

24. Bayazıt EÖ, Karabıyık M. Chairside restorations of maxillary anterior teeth with cad/cam porcelain laminate veneers produced by digital workflow: a case report with a step to facilitate restoration design. Case Rep Dent. 2019;2019.

25. Alshali S, Asali R. Conventional and digital workflow planning for maxillary teeth restoration with porcelain laminate veneers: a clinical report. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2022; 14:45.

26. Nokar S, Hendi A, Hemmati YB, Falahchai M. Use of digital-conventional method for managing a patient with severely worn dentition: a clinical report. Case Rep Dent. 2018;2018.

27. Albuquerque PP, Moreno MBP, Nishida AC, Rodrigues E, Kiyohara C, Francci CE. Prefabricated resin veneer: a case report of a simplified restorative technique. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2018 Jun 20;12(2):140.

28. Tauböck TT, Schmidlin PR, Attin T. Vertical bite rehabilitation of severely worn dentitions with direct composite restorations: clinical performance up to 11 years. J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 2;10(8):10.

29. Yanikian CRF, Yanikian F, Sundfeld D, Lins RBE, Martins LRM. Direct composite resin veneers in nonvital teeth: a still viable alternative to mask dark substrates. Oper Dent. 2019 Jul 1;44(4):E159–66.

30. Fahl N, Ritter A V. Composite veneers: the direct–indirect technique revisited. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jan 1;33(1):7–19.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-18

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Revista Clínica de Odontologia

Section

Relato de Caso

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Clínica de Odontologia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>